Can Your Employer Dictate Your Recovery Timeline After a Work Injury in New York?

An experienced workers’ compensation lawyer can fight for your rights

In New York City, injured workers often face pressure to return to work quickly after an accident. In industries like construction, transportation, hospitality, and healthcare, missing time due to injury can put someone’s job or income at risk. Employers may encourage a speedy return, but the legal reality is clear – employers cannot dictate when a worker is medically ready to go back to work.

That doesn’t stop them from trying. Through insurance carriers, third-party administrators, nurse case managers, and employer-selected medical providers, employers and insurers often influence the return-to-work timeline. And in the New York workers’ compensation system, even when the law says recovery should be based on medical facts, the process isn’t always fair to the injured worker.

Knowing who has the legal authority to determine readiness, and how to protect a claim from outside pressure, is essential to anyone recovering from a serious work-related injury or illness in the five boroughs.

Who decides when an injured worker can return to work?

In New York’s workers’ compensation system, only a licensed medical provider can officially determine when an injured worker is ready to return to work. This provider – known as the treating physician – oversees medical care, tracks recovery, and determines when a worker has reached maximum medical improvement (MMI). The treating doctor also sets work restrictions, makes referrals to specialists, and provides the documentation needed to continue receiving benefits.

To qualify as a treating physician in a workers’ compensation case, the doctor must be authorized by the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB). Not every doctor is approved to treat injured workers under the system. If a worker sees a non-authorized provider, the visit may not be reimbursed, and the medical records might not be accepted as part of the claim. That can delay benefits or even jeopardize the entire case.

There are a few ways to find a WCB-authorized provider in New York City:

Use the WCB’s official provider search tool: The Workers’ Compensation Board maintains a searchable online directory on its website, where workers can find approved doctors by location, specialty, and language. This includes orthopedists, chiropractors, neurologists, physical therapists, and other specialists authorized to treat work-related injuries.
Ask a workers’ compensation attorney for a referral: Experienced attorneys often work with providers who understand the specific documentation, deadlines, and reporting standards required by the board. A referral from someone familiar with the system can help ensure the provider is not only authorized but also experienced in standing up to insurance challenges.
Check with a union or occupational clinic: For unionized workers, certain clinics may have in-network providers already authorized by the WCB. These doctors are often familiar with the physical demands of specific trades and how injuries affect the ability to return to work.

While workers may also receive provider lists from their employer’s insurance carrier, it’s important to approach those suggestions carefully. Insurers often prefer doctors who take a more conservative view of injuries or who are quick to declare a worker ready for light-duty. Before scheduling any appointment, it’s always best to verify the doctor’s authorization status using the official WCB search tool.

Independent medical examinations (IME)

At the same time, employers and insurers are allowed to schedule an independent medical examination (IME). An IME is a one-time evaluation conducted by a doctor chosen and paid by the insurance company – not the worker. These exams are typically held in private clinics that contract with insurers, not hospitals or emergency rooms.

IMEs serve several purposes. Some are used to evaluate whether further treatment is medically necessary. Others assess disability status or determine whether the injury is related to the job. The exam is often brief, and the IME doctor may not have access to the full medical record or treatment history.

Although IMEs are framed as objective, they frequently favor the insurance company’s position. If the IME report states that the worker is fully recovered or no longer needs treatment, the insurer may use that opinion to reduce or cut off benefits – even if the treating physician continues to recommend care or workplace restrictions.

When an IME contradicts the treating doctor’s opinion, the situation can quickly escalate into a legal dispute. The treating physician’s findings remain central to the case, but the IME can still trigger a suspension of benefits unless the worker takes action to challenge it. This is one of the many points in the process where legal representation can make a substantial difference.

How employers and insurers apply pressure

Across New York City, injured workers report frequent contact from supervisors or HR asking when they’ll return. These calls may start off friendly but often escalate, with reminders of the consequences for not returning on a certain timeline. Insurance companies may suggest that benefits will end or that continued absence looks suspicious.

This pressure is amplified when insurers assign vocational rehabilitation counselors or nurse case managers. Though framed as helpful, these individuals often aim to accelerate the return-to-work process, with the insurer’s interests in mind.

None of these tactics legally determine recovery. But the pressure can cause workers to make decisions that harm both their health and their case.

The IME vs. treating doctor conflict

It’s common for the treating doctor and the IME doctor to disagree. The treating physician may recommend continued rest, physical therapy, or job restrictions, while the IME doctor may claim the worker is fully recovered or no longer needs medical care. When this happens, benefits can be suspended, modified, or denied entirely – sometimes without warning.

Conflicting reports often create confusion and frustration. Workers may not know whose opinion to follow or how to respond when a check doesn’t arrive or treatment is suddenly rejected by the insurer. The treating physician’s report still carries weight under New York law, but in practice, workers often have to fight to ensure that opinion isn’t overshadowed by a one-time IME. Some common signs that an IME conflict is affecting a claim include:

A sudden stop in weekly checks or wage replacement benefits: This often happens after an IME doctor reports that the worker is no longer disabled, even if their treating doctor has not cleared them to return to work.
A denied request for surgery, imaging, or ongoing therapy: Insurers may cite the IME’s opinion that additional care isn’t medically necessary, even when the treating physician has already recommended the treatment.
A notice from the insurer stating the worker is “fit for duty” or able to work light duty: This language usually comes directly from the IME report. If the treating doctor has not lifted restrictions, this is a red flag that the two opinions are in direct conflict.
Confusion or concern from the treating physician about insurance decisions: When a provider says, “That’s strange, I didn’t change your status,” or expresses surprise at a denial, it’s often a sign that an IME has overruled their judgment.
A request to attend a hearing or respond to a claim suspension: This typically follows a formal dispute caused by dueling medical opinions. Workers who ignore this step may lose benefits permanently.

These situations are fairly common, and they are not always easy to fix without help. A single IME should not outweigh months of consistent medical care. But unless the conflict is addressed quickly and strategically, the insurer may move forward as if the IME report is final. Responding early, gathering supporting documentation from the treating physician, and preparing to challenge the IME are essential steps to keeping the claim intact.

What happens if a worker returns too soon

Returning to work too early can worsen injuries or create new complications. Some workers are assigned tasks that violate restrictions or strain healing areas. In physically demanding jobs – such as those in construction, warehousing, or maintenance – this risk is especially high.

If a worker tries to return but can’t perform the job, the employer may argue they refused suitable employment. That claim can result in benefits being cut off, even when the worker is still legitimately hurt.

For workers living paycheck to paycheck, the decision to return too early may feel unavoidable. But doing so can compromise both health and long-term compensation.

Understanding light-duty work and modified assignments

Employers often offer “light-duty” work to get injured workers back on-site. These assignments must align with the worker’s restrictions and medical needs, but in practice, they often don’t.

In many cases, workers report being given duties that are physically demanding or psychologically punitive. Some assignments are designed to push the worker into quitting, while others ignore clear medical instructions. The following issues often arise with modified duty:

Tasks that violate restrictions: Assignments may involve lifting, climbing, or extended standing when a doctor has limited those activities.
Jobs designed to discourage: Workers may be assigned to roles with no real purpose, in isolated areas, or under hostile supervision.
Hidden health risks: Modified duty jobs may expose workers to cold, heat, or other stressors that aggravate their injuries.

Reviewing any light-duty offer carefully – and confirming its compatibility with medical restrictions – is critical. A lawyer can help assess whether an offer is legitimate or a tactic to undermine the claim.

How legal representation levels the playing field

The New York workers’ compensation system favors employers and insurance companies that understand how to work within it. Injured workers are often unfamiliar with the rules and timelines, and they may not realize how much is at stake. An experienced NYC workers’ compensation lawyer can:

Challenge IME reports: When an insurer tries to rely on a biased or premature IME, a lawyer can use medical evidence to dispute it.
Enforce medical restrictions: If an employer ignores a doctor’s orders, legal counsel can push back and protect the worker.
Keep benefits flowing: A lawyer can fight to ensure wage replacement and medical benefits continue during recovery.
Evaluate light-duty offers: Legal review can prevent workers from accepting roles that jeopardize recovery or violate legal protections.
Appeal unfair denials: If benefits are stopped prematurely, a lawyer can file objections, request hearings, and pursue appeals.

Having the right lawyer doesn’t just increase the odds of success – it makes the entire process more manageable.

Medical recovery should be based on facts — not pressure

Injured workers across New York City are often pushed to return to work before they’re ready. Many aren’t told they can challenge an IME, decline an inappropriate light-duty assignment, or appeal a sudden cutoff in benefits. Navigating this system alone can lead to denied claims, worsening injuries, and lost income.

Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP provides the legal support injured workers need to protect their rights and stay focused on real recovery. Conflicting medical opinions, insurer delays, and employer pressure shouldn’t determine the outcome of a claim.

Contact us to schedule a free consultation for the guidance and representation you need to move forward. Deadlines are strict, and acting early can protect both your health and your financial future.

“I want to express my deepest gratitude to Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP and team for the outstanding job they did handling my workers’ compensation case. From start to finish, their professionalism, expertise, and dedication. Attorney Amanda Katz’s knowledge and strategic approach gave me confidence throughout the process, and her attention to detail was remarkable. A special mention to the paralegal team – they were always approachable, efficient, and proactive in addressing my questions and concerns. Special thanks to Kimberly Wu. Thanks to their hard work and commitment, my case had the best possible outcome. I highly recommend the Pasternack team and Attorney Amanda Katz to anyone in need of legal assistance. They truly go above and beyond for their clients!” – Arly B., ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Click here for a printable PDF of this article, “Can Your Employer Dictate Your Recovery Timeline After a Work Injury in New York?”